About this site
Who writes this, who reviews it, and the rules it writes under.
01
What this site is
MyAlphaErec is the U.S. stocking partner for Alpha Erec. It is not the manufacturer and not the brand. It holds no stock, takes no payment, ships nothing and cannot see an order.
What it does is read what was supplied with the product and write down what is there and what is not. On this product the second half of that sentence turned out to be the longer one.
02
The desk
Pages here are written by The MyAlphaErec editorial desk. The desk's job is to transcribe, to check arithmetic, and to say plainly when something is missing rather than writing around the hole.
03
Who reviews these pages
Medical review is attributed to a named physician. Until that person confirms in writing that they have read these pages, the attribution and its date are published as fill-in slots rather than as facts, and no reviewedBy appears in this site’s structured data.
04
What this site will not publish
- Any amount, for any of the ten ingredients. None was declared anywhere in the pack.
- A transcription of the Supplement Facts panel. No photograph of the back of the bottle was supplied, so there is nothing to transcribe.
- Any serving weight, net weight or gummy weight.
- Any claim that this product treats erectile dysfunction, raises testosterone, or does anything a medicine does.
- Any verified customer review, or any Review or AggregateRating markup.
- Any study this site did not open and read. Two research databases would not open without clearing a verification page, and nothing from them is cited here.
- Any PubMed identifier.
- Any certificate of analysis. The pack gives a CoA reference; a reference is not a result.
- Any delivery date. The pack gives a range from the sales FAQ and this site prints it as that.
- Any suggestion that the absence of an FDA notification naming this product is a test result.
05
Our score, and how it is built
Eight criteria, ten points each. The money and the contact details score well here — better than most products this desk has looked at. Everything that depends on the label scores zero, because the label this site was given stops at the front of the bottle.
- Label disclosure0/10
There is no Supplement Facts panel in this pack. Not a thin one — none. Nothing else on this row can be scored.
- Panel arithmetic0/10
Not assessable. There is no panel, no serving size, no blend total and no ingredient weight to check anything against.
- Dose-to-evidence match0/10
Not assessable for any of the ten, because no amount is declared for any of the ten.
- Claim quality3/10
The front of the bottle is restrained:
men's performance gummy
and nothing more. The listing graphics are less so, and two of their ingredient claims run against what NIH publishes about those same ingredients. - Price transparency8/10
Three packs, three per-bottle prices, three totals, and the arithmetic is right in all three. The struck-through
was
price of $179 a bottle is the part a buyer should treat carefully. - Guarantee clarity6/10
60 days from purchase, a phone number and an email to claim it, named return address, and buyer-paid return shipping stated up front. The problem is not the clarity of the term — it is the length, against the seller's own timing copy.
- Contactability8/10
Two emails, a phone desk open 7:00am–9:00pm seven days, an office address and a separate returns address. The bottle itself names nobody.
- Label correctness0/10
Two ingredient lists that disagree by four ingredients, including both of the two that carry Daily Values, and no panel in which to resolve them.
What this page was checked against
Every figure on it is transcribed from the supplied Supplement Facts panel and checked-out pack, derived by arithmetic from those, or taken from a source on the references page.